Business Process Automation Services

Business Process Automation Services

Stop paying people to do what software should be doing.

The spreadsheet emailed round three departments. The same data typed into three systems. The report somebody rebuilds every Monday. We replace that work with software that runs it properly: first process live in 30 days, and we will tell you honestly if a $20 tool does it instead.

You own everything we build.

Who you’ll actually work with

Anand Yadav, Founder of SightInfusion Infotech

Anand Yadav

Upwork Top Rated100% Job Success Score54 client reviews52+ products shipped

I am Anand Yadav, founder of SightInfusion. I have been building software for over 7 years and I have personally delivered more than 52 products.

In automation, the fastest way to waste your money is to build something custom when a rule, a tool or a tidier spreadsheet would have done it. So on the first call I try to talk you down: can a $20 a month tool run this? Can we make it a rule instead of AI? Do you actually run this process often enough for the build to pay for itself?

If the answer is that you do not need us, that is what you will hear on the call, not after the invoice.

What usually goes wrong

What clients say, and what it actually means

“We have a person whose whole job is copying this from one spreadsheet to another.”

What it means

Nobody had costed what that person's time was actually worth.

“We tried a no-code tool but it broke the moment volume went up.”

What it means

The tool was fine. The process it was automating was never actually defined.

“Can you just automate what we do now?”

What it means

What they do now was never written down anywhere, so nobody had agreed on it either.

What you actually receive

Most agencies describe the work. Here is what is yours at the end of it.

DeliverableWhat it is
Process mapYour process as it actually runs: every step, every exception, every person, agreed before anything is built
The baselineHours per week, cost per month, error rate, measured before we change anything
The automationBuilt, tested on your real cases, running
Source codeFull repository, full IP transfer, in your account
Written rulesThe logic in readable form, so your own team can see exactly what it does and when
RunbookWhat it does, what it will not do, how to pause it, who to call
The running costHosting and licence cost of what we built, per month, in writing
Training for the people who use itNot a PDF. A session with the actual staff, and a recording they keep
Handover walkthroughRecorded, covering the whole system and the credentials

If any of these is missing at handover, the job is not finished.

You own it. Take it anywhere. Code, rules and process map are yours on final payment. Run it in-house, hand it to another agency, or switch it off.

What we automate

Data moving between systems

No more copying between your CRM, accounting software and spreadsheets. One place owns each piece of information.

Recurring reports

Built and delivered on schedule, every time, without anyone rebuilding them.

Approval workflows

Routed to the right person, chased automatically, logged. The WhatsApp chase becomes a record.

Order and invoice processing

From receipt to record without manual entry, for the cases that follow rules.

Scheduling and dispatch

Jobs, staff and resources assigned by your rules, not by whoever is free to work it out.

Notifications and reminders

Customers and staff told the right thing at the right time, including the chase nobody remembers to send.

Onboarding processes

New customer or employee steps that run themselves: the forms, the accounts, the checklist, the follow-ups.

Replacing the spreadsheet the whole company depends on

The one that only one person really understands. We turn it into software with proper rules, permissions and history.

If what you actually need is a screen your team opens daily rather than a process running quietly in the background, that is web apps and admin panels, not automation.

Should you just buy Zapier instead?

Sometimes yes. Here are the real prices, and the arithmetic.

This is the question that decides most of these projects, so we will answer it properly instead of pretending the tools do not exist.

ToolEntry priceCharges by
ZapierFree (100 tasks/mo); Professional from $19.99/mo; Team from $69/mo (25 users)Tasks
MakeFree (1,000 ops); Core $12/mo, Pro $21/mo, Teams $38/mo at the 10,000/mo tierCredits, one module action equals one credit
n8n CloudStarter €20/mo (2,500); Pro €50/mo (10,000); Business €667/mo (40,000). Unlimited users and workflowsWorkflow executions
Power AutomatePremium $15/user/mo; Process $150/bot/mo; Hosted Process $215/bot/moUser, or bot
AirtableFree; Team $20/seat annual ($24 monthly); Business $45/seat annual ($54 monthly)Seat
RetoolFree (≤5 users); Team $10/builder + $5/user; Business $50/builder + $15/userBuilder and end-user seats

Buy a tool when

  • the connection you need already exists in their library
  • your volume is low and stable
  • one or two people run it
  • you can live with it breaking occasionally and someone noticing
  • nobody needs a record of what happened and why

Build custom when

  • the tool cannot reach your system, because the connector does not exist
  • your volume has pushed the bill somewhere uncomfortable
  • the logic has grown past what anyone can follow in a visual editor
  • it has to be right every time, with an audit trail
  • the process is the one your business actually runs on

Now the honest part: there is no published crossover point, and we are not going to invent one. You will find blog posts saying the economics turn once your monthly spend exceeds what a custom build costs including hosting, which is true and also useless, because none of them will tell you what a custom build costs. So do this instead, on the back of an envelope, before you talk to anyone:

  • What is the tool costing you a month today, at your real volume? Check the next tier too, task and credit pricing steps up sharply.
  • Multiply by 24. That is two years of the cheap option.
  • Ask us for a fixed build price and the monthly running cost of what we would build.
  • If the two-year tool cost does not comfortably clear the build, keep the tool. We will say the same thing on the call.

And a note on cheap. Per-task and per-credit pricing is comfortable at low volume and unpleasant at high volume, which is exactly the direction a working automation moves in. That is not an argument for building on day one. It is an argument for knowing your number before your volume finds it for you.

Where the time goes

The work worth automating is the boring, repeated kind

Nobody writes down the twenty minutes a day spent copying rows between two systems. Across a year that is a full working month. Finding those is the first thing we do.

An arm with a smartwatch showing a gear and a checklist

Process

One process. Thirty days. A number at each end.

Fit call, 30 min, free

You describe the task. We tell you whether it is a build, a rule, a tool, or not worth doing

An honest answer, no report to buy

Days 1 to 5

We sit with the people doing the work and map what actually happens, not what the process document says. We measure hours, cost and error rate before touching anything

Process map and baseline

Days 6 to 20

We build it and test it against your real historical cases

Test results on your own data

Days 21 to 25

It runs alongside your team, with a person confirming. We fix what the real world exposes

Live in parallel

Days 26 to 30

It runs on its own, with logging, limits and a manual override. We train the people who use it and measure the same number again

Live automation and the before/after

Then we do the next process, or we stop, because the next one is not worth it. We will say which.

Why the fit call is free here, and the AI audit next door is not. A fit call is a scoping conversation: 30 minutes, and we can usually tell straight away whether a rule, a tool or a build is the answer. The AI Readiness Audit is an investigation, two weeks of work across your operations, data and systems, ending in a written report, so it is paid, at $750, and credited back if you build. The rule we hold to: charge when the diagnostic is an investigation, do not charge when it is a scoping call. If you arrive here unsure what to automate across the whole business, that is the audit, not this call.

Will we be stuck with you forever?

The right question, and most agencies never answer it

It is the third-ranked objection in this category and there is a good reason for it. Custom internal software has a way of becoming something only two people understand, and one of them works for the agency.

The code. Yours. Full repository, IP transfer on final payment

The accounts. Hosting, database and third-party accounts in your name, not ours

The rules. Handed over in readable form, not buried in code only we can follow

The documentation. Written for the next developer, not for us

The training. The people who use it are trained, with a recording they keep

Notice. 30 days on any monthly plan. No exit fee

Handover. A recorded walkthrough of the whole system and every credential

If the day comes that you want another agency, or your own hire, to take this over, they can, without calling us first. That is the standard.

Three times the answer is no

Reason 1

The volume is too low

If the task takes twenty minutes a week, a build will not pay for itself no matter how annoying it is. Annoying and expensive are different problems.

Reason 2

A $20 tool already does it

If the connector exists and your volume is low, buy the tool. Prices and arithmetic, including the part where we tell you to keep it.

Reason 3

The process is about to change anyway

If you are mid-reorganisation, or the process is three months old and still moving, automating it now means automating a guess. Wait, run it manually, and let it settle.

And one where the spreadsheet is genuinely fine. A small team, one person who maintains it, low stakes if it breaks: that spreadsheet is doing its job. The moment to worry is not when it gets messy. It is when only one person understands it and they are the single point of failure. That is a real risk, and it is a different conversation from the spreadsheet is ugly.

The quiet way these projects die

Will your staff actually use it?

The automation that fails is rarely the one that does not work. It is the one nobody uses, or that only one person can run.

  • We map the process with the people who do the work, not with the person who described it to us
  • It runs alongside them for a week before it runs instead of them, so they see it be right before they have to trust it
  • We train the actual users, in a session, with a recording they keep. Not a PDF
  • A manual override on everything. Anyone who needs to step in, can
  • Written rules in readable form, so the next person can understand the system without a developer
AI-Powered Prayer & Bible App for iOS, Android & Web
FaithTech·Media & Consumer·praythe.bible↗

AI-Powered Prayer & Bible App for iOS, Android & Web

A full native-to-Flutter rewrite of a Christian prayer app pairing AI-generated, Scripture-fused prayers with a validated spiritual wellbeing tracker, 7,464 prayer topics and 550,000+ verse mappings, shipped for iOS, Android and web.

Outcome & Context
The Pray the Bible admin panel replaced a publishing workflow that took new staff two weeks to learn. After the rebuild, training took two days, publication time dropped 65%, and the team published 3x faster.
FlutterFirebaseOpenAI

Tata Power SolaRoof replaced paper-based channel partner inspections with GPS tagging and barcode scanning, dropping lead to order time by 45% and reaching 99% asset tracking accuracy.

Where we have shipped

Industries we automate for

Each item below lists industry and what we automate.
CRM, HR & Internal Business Tools
CRM, HR & Internal Business ToolsApprovals, reporting, onboarding, data entry between systems
Fintech & Banking
Fintech & BankingApplication handling, reconciliation, KYC workflows
Legal-Tech
Legal-TechDocument intake, case data, filing workflows
Retail, POS & E-commerce
Retail, POS & E-commerceOrder and invoice processing, stock alerts, supplier admin
Energy & Utilities
Energy & UtilitiesField reporting, asset tracking, inspection workflows
Logistics & Field Operations
Logistics & Field OperationsDispatch, job assignment, field data capture
Events, Media & Community
Events, Media & CommunityPublishing workflows, moderation queues
Healthcare & Wellness
Healthcare & WellnessPatient admin, records handling, scheduling
Real Estate & PropTech
Real Estate & PropTechListing admin, enquiry routing, tenant workflows
EdTech & Training
EdTech & TrainingEnrolment, assessment admin, learner follow-up

WALL OF PROOF

What clients say once the project is over

The SightInfusion team delivered our app with impressive speed, clear communication, and reliable quality. Every detail was handled thoughtfully, and the final result exceeded expectations. A professional team we're excited to work with again soon.

Dimitri Orga
Dimitri Orga
CEO & Asset Manager, FIDEX DLT

Working with SightInfusion was a smooth and professional experience. The team was proactive, technically strong, and always transparent with updates. Our finance app was delivered on time with great care. We look forward to future projects together.

Debi Prasad Naik
Debi Prasad Naik
CTO, EVOS Solutions Private Limited

SightInfusion handled our complex project with patience, expertise, and consistent communication. Their team learns fast, solves challenges quickly, and delivers dependable results. A skilled, trustworthy team we'll confidently partner with again in the future.

Vishal Pulikottil
Vishal Pulikottil
CEO / Founder, Instinctive Studio

Frequently asked questions

Do we have to replace our current software?

No. We connect to what you already use. See what we automate.

Why can't we just use Zapier or Power Automate?

Often you can, and we will tell you so. Real prices for all six main tools, when buying beats building, and the arithmetic to work it out yourself, including the part where the answer is keep the tool.

Will this replace our staff?

It removes the repetitive part of the work. In practice teams handle more volume rather than shrink. We are not going to promise a headcount saving we cannot measure, and if that is the only reason for the project, the numbers usually disappoint.

How long does the first automation take?

30 days from the start of the build, after a free 30 minute fit call. Week by week.

What does it cost to run every month?

Hosting, any third-party licence, and maintenance if you want it, stated in writing in every proposal, at your real volume rather than the entry tier. Rules-based automation has no per-use model cost, which is the main reason it is cheaper than the AI version.

What if the process changes later?

We build it so it can be changed, and the rules are handed over in readable form so your own team can adjust the simple things. The monthly plan covers the rest. If your process is still moving right now, wait.

Will we be locked in to you?

No. Code, rules and documentation are yours, the accounts are in your name, notice is 30 days, and the handover is recorded. All seven commitments.

Our staff are not technical. Will they cope?

That is the part most of these projects get wrong. We map the process with the people who actually do the work, run the automation alongside them before it replaces them, and train the real users in a session they keep a recording of. Two published adoption numbers.

Do we need AI for this?

Probably not, and that is good news. Rules are cheaper, faster and give the same answer every time. AI earns its place only where the input is genuinely messy: free text, scanned documents, exceptions. See AI Agents & Automation for where the line falls.

What if it breaks at 2am?

Rules-based automation fails loudly and predictably, which is one of its advantages. You get alerting, a full log, and a manual override so the work can still be done by hand while it is fixed. Response times depend on the plan you are on, and we will write them down rather than imply them.

Can you automate something that involves reading documents or emails?

Partly. If the documents are consistent, rules handle them. If they are messy, scanned, handwritten, free text, every supplier's invoice a different shape, that needs AI Agents & Automation, and it costs more. We will tell you which one your documents are before you commit.

How do we know it is actually saving anything?

Because we measure the same number before and after. Days 1 to 5 are a baseline: hours per week, cost per month, error rate. If we cannot measure the process, we say so before you spend anything. An unmeasurable saving is not a saving.

Who owns the code?

You do, on final payment, on accounts in your name.

We are a small business. Is this worth it for us?

Sometimes yes, often no, and we will be honest about which. There is no minimum contract size here, but there is a minimum volume where a build pays for itself. See section on when to say no.

Have something in mind

Tell us the problem. We bring the engineering.

A short call, an honest answer on whether we are the right team, and a scope you can hold us to.

Start a project